《中国实用神经疾病杂志》官方网站
国际标准刊号(ISSN):1673-5110 国内统一刊号(CN):41-1381/R
您的位置:首页 > 论著

不同类型神经梅毒驱梅后实验室检查指标差异分析

作者 / Author:师 璐 黄宇明 寇 程 许东梅

不同类型神经梅毒驱梅后实验室检查指标差异分析
师 璐12 黄宇明12 寇 程12 许东梅12 
1)首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院,北京 100015  2)国家传染病医学中心,北京 100015
通信作者:许东梅
摘要目的 探讨无症状神经梅毒、脊髓痨和麻痹性痴呆驱梅后实验室检查指标的差异及影响因素。方法 收集首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院神经内科住院治疗的 50 例 HIV 阴性神经梅毒患者,其中无症状 16 例,脊髓痨 14 例,麻痹性痴呆 20 例。比较驱梅后 3 组间外周血和脑脊液(CSF)实验室检查指标,采用Logistic回归分析CSF蛋白和CSF甲苯胺红不加热血清试验(TRUST)滴度的影响因素。结果 驱梅后外周血淋巴细胞(LY)及亚群多重比较,无症状患者LY 总数显著大于脊髓痨和麻痹性痴呆患者,CD4T 淋巴细胞计数显著大于麻痹性痴呆患者,CD8T 淋巴细胞计数显著大于脊髓痨患者(P<0.05);驱梅后脊髓痨患者CSF蛋白显著高于无症状和麻痹性痴呆患者(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析提示,驱梅后麻痹性痴呆和无症状患者 CSF 蛋白更倾向低于脊髓痨患者(OR=0.169,95% CI:0.033~0.875,P=0.034;OR=0.092,95% CI:0.015~0.573,P=0.011);脊髓痨和麻痹性痴呆患者 CSF TRUST 滴度更倾向高于无症状患者(OR=15.298,95% CI:2.070~113.077,P=0.008;OR=14.736,95% CI:2.174~99.886,P=0.006)。结论 不同类型神经梅毒驱梅后实验室检查指标差异可能与免疫损伤和病理改变有关,应动态监测这类指标预测病情和预后,制定个体化精准治疗方案。
【关键词】 神经梅毒;临床分型;驱梅治疗;实验室检查指标;影响因素
【中图分类号】 R759.1+ 3 【文献标识码】 A 【文章编号】 1673-5110 (2022) 07-0825-07
基金项目:首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院院内科研基金“启航计划”项目(编号:DTQH201607)
DOI:10.12083/SYSJ.220713
 
Analysis the differences of laboratory indexes among different types of neurosyphilis after penicillin treatment
SHI Lu12 ,HUANG Yuming12 ,KOU Cheng12 ,XU Dongmei12
1)Beijing Ditan Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100015,China;
2)National Center for Infectious Disease,Beijing 100015,China
Corresponding author:XU Dongmei
AbstractObjective To investigate the differences and influencing factors of laboratory indexes among asymptomatic neurosyphilis,tabes dorsalis and general paresis after penicillin treatment. Methods Totally of 50 HIV-negative neurosyphilis patients were enrolled,who were hospitalized in the Department of Neurology,Beijing Ditan Hospital,Capital Medical University including 16 patients of asymptomatic neurosyphilis,14 patients of tabes dorsalis and 20 patients of general paresis. The differences in peripheral blood and cerebrospinal fluid(CSF) indexes after treatment were compared among the three groups,and influencing factors of CSF protein and CSF TRUST titer were analyzed by Logistic regression. Results Post hoc multiple comparisons of peripheral blood lymphocytes(LY)and their subgroups showed that the count of LY in asymptomatic neurosyphilis was significantly higher than tabes dorsalis and general paresis,while the count of CD4+T lymphocytes in asymptomatic neurosyphilis was significantly higher than general paresis and the count of CD8+T lymphocytes in asymptomatic neurosyphilis was significantly higher than tabes dorsalis(P<0.05). The CSF protein quantification of tabes dorsaliswas significantly higher than asymptomatic neurosyphilis and general paresis after treatment(P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that CSF protein of general paresis and asymptomatic neurosyphilis after treatment was more likely to be lower than tabes dorsalis (OR=0.169,95% CI:0.033-0.875,P=0.034;OR=0.092,95% CI:0.015-0.573,P=0.011);CSF TRUST titer of tabes dorsalis and general paresis more likely to be higher than asymptomatic neurosyphilis(OR=15.298,95% CI:2.070-113.077,P=0.008;OR=14.736,95% CI:2.174-99.886,P=0.006). Conclusion The differences in laboratory indexes among three types of neurosyphilis after penicillin treatment may be related to immune damage and pathological changes. Monitor the changes of laboratory indexes after treatment dynamically in order to predict the state and prognosis of illness,and formulate individualized and precise therapy.
Key words】 Neurosyphilis;Clinical classification;Penicillin treatment;Laboratory indexes;Influencing factors

 

相关文章 / Related articles

    无相关信息
所属栏目:论著
分享本页至: